Skip to main content

Psychology: Research and Review

Table 3 Comparison of fit indices among the proposed models

From: Validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Perceived Motivational Climate in Sports Questionnaire-2 (PMCSQ-2BR)

Model

X2

df

ΔX2

GFI

AGFI

RMSEA (90% C.I.)

PNFI

PGFI

NNFI

SRMR

CFI

1

1104.47

495.00

  

0.88

0.86

0.05

(0.049–0.058)

0.73

0.77

0.74

0.10

0.76

2

860.86

494.00

243.61

***

0.93

0.92

0.04

(0.037–0.046)

0.82

0.82

0.84

0.07

0.85

3

2303.19

495.00

  

0.64

0.59

0.09

(0.089–0.096)

0.31

0.57

0.23

0.17

0.27

4

828.42

480.00

1474.77

***

0.94

0.93

0.04

(0.036–0.046)

0.80

0.80

0.85

0.07

0.86

5

1082.89

489.00

  

0.88

0.87

0.05

(0.049–0.058)

0.72

0.77

0.74

0.09

0.76

6

830.55

488.00

252.35

***

0.94

0.93

0.04

(0.036–0.045)

0.81

0.81

0.85

0.07

0.86

  1. X2 chi-square, df degrees of freedom, ΔX2 difference between two nested models, GFI goodness-of-fit index, AGFI adjusted goodness-of-fit index, RMSEA (90% C.I.) root mean square error of approximation with 90% confidence interval, PNFI parsimony normed fit index, PGFI parsimony goodness-of-fit index, NNFI non-normed fit index, SRMR standardized root mean square residual, CFI comparative fit index
  2. ***p < 0.001