Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included suicide prevention reviews

From: Scoping review of 30 years of suicide prevention in university students around the world: efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness

Revision (author and year) AMSTAR score Total studies included Studies applied at universities Years surveyed Terms used by authors Type of evaluation carried out
Harrod et al. (2014) 11 8 8 NLT to 2011 Effects Efficacy
Yonemoto et al. (2019) 8 16 1 NLT to 2017 Effectiveness Efficacy
Zechmeister et al. (2008) 8 14 1 NLT to 2007 Cost-effectiveness Cost-effectiveness
Kreuze et al. (2017) 7 16 1 NR to 2015 Effectiveness Efficacy
Kutcher et al. (2017) 7 6 1 NLT to 2017 Effectiveness Efficacy
Robinson et al. (2018) 7 21 4 NR to 2016 Types of evidence Efficacy
Witt et al. (2019) 6 39 1 NLT to 2017 Effectiveness Efficacy
Wolitzky-Taylor et al. (2019) 5 15 15 2000–2018 Effects Efficacy
  1. AMSTAR A tool to assess systematic literature reviews, NTL no time limit, NR not reported