Skip to main content

Psychology: Research and Review

Table 1 Studies with evidence of self-handicapping scale validity

From: Self-handicapping strategies in educational context: construction and validation of the Brazilian Self-Handicapping Strategies Scale (EEAPREJ)

 

Authors (year)

Sample

Method

Results

Self-Handicapping Scale (SHS)

Jones and Rhodewalt (1982)

Rhodewalt et al. (1984)

27 university students

32 athletes

Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α)

Test-retest reliability

α = 0.78

r = 0.74

Strube (1986)

168 university students

Cronbach’s α

Extraction of principal components (PCA)

α = 0.62

6 one-dimensional factors

10 items

Akın (2012)

585 university students

Cronbach’s α

Test-retest

EFA

AFC

0.90

0.94

1 factor

Good fit

Clarke and MacCann (2016)

484 university students

Parallel analysis

EFA (MLE)

CFA

2 factors (internal and external)

Acceptable fit for 13 items

Akar et al. (2018). Version: Akın (2012)

350 university students

Cronbach’s α

CFA

0.97

Acceptable fit for 25 items

Barutçu Yıldırım and Demir (2019)

Version: Akın (2012)

801 university students

Cronbach’s α

0.74

Jensen and Deemer (2020)

946 university students

Cronbach’s α

(2 factors )

Internal 0.76

External 0.72

Şahin and Çoban (2020)

Version: Akın (2012)

981 university students

Cronbach’s α

CFA

0.60

Good fit for 1 factor

Karami et al. (2020)

360 university students

Cronbach’s α

0.80