Skip to main content

Psychology: Research and Review

Table 2 The ANOVA of the overall weighted scores of CBI-Br (three-factor model) and the burnout (SOHM) between gender and function

From: Burnout syndrome in university professors and academic staff members: psychometric properties of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory–Brazilian version

Variable

PB

WB

CBa

Burnout

Gender

(mean ± standard deviation)

 Men (n = 296)

2.11 ± 0.90

2.08 ± 0.86

2.05 ± 0.97

2.08 ± 0.86

 Women (n = 380)

2.68 ± 1.05

2.55 ± 0.97

2.30 ± 0.96

2.55 ± 0.98

 Total (n = 676)

2.43 ± 1.03

2.35 ± 0.95

2.19 ± 0.97

2.34 ± 0.96

F statistic

56.01

43.19

10.91

42.83

p value

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.001

< 0.001

Function

 Professors (n = 370)

2.36 ± 0.96

2.30 ± 0.88

2.24 ± 0.96

2.30 ± 0.89

 Academic staff (n = 306)

2.51 ± 1.11

2.40 ± 1.03

2.12 ± 0.99

2.40 ± 1.03

 Total (n = 676)

2.43 ± 1.03

2.35 ± 0.95

2.19 ± 0.97

2.34 ± 0.96

F statistic

3.48

1.88

2.62

1.96

p value

0.063

0.171

0.106

0.162

  1. PB personal burnout, WB work-related burnout, CB colleagues-related burnout
  2. aANOVA with Welch’s correction