Skip to main content

Table 3 Goodness of fit indices for the model of the confirmatory factor analyses for the URS with sample 2 (CFA1) and sample 3 (CFA2)

From: Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the uncertainty response scale

  CFA1 (N = 543) CFA2 (N = 541)
  χ2 (df) p χ2/df CFI TLI RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE χ2 (df) p value χ2/df CFI TLI RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE
Model A 2636 (776) p < .001 3.40 .80 .79 .067 .064 .069 < .001          
Model B1 734 (272) p < .001 2.70 .93 .92 .056 .051 .061 .02          
Model B2 641 (269) p < .001 2.38 .94 .93 .051 .046 .056 .42 668 p < .001 2.49 .93 .92 .052 .047 .057 .20
  1. χ2 Chi-square, df degrees of freedom, p p value, CFI comparative fit index, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, LO 90 lower limit of a 90% confidence interval for the population value of RMSEA, HI 90 upper limit of a 90% confidence interval for the population value of RMSEA, PCLOSE RMSEA p value