Skip to main content
Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica

Psychology: Research and Review

Table 3 Goodness of fit indices for the model of the confirmatory factor analyses for the URS with sample 2 (CFA1) and sample 3 (CFA2)

From: Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the uncertainty response scale

 

CFA1 (N = 543)

CFA2 (N = 541)

 

χ2 (df)

p

χ2/df

CFI

TLI

RMSEA

LO 90

HI 90

PCLOSE

χ2 (df)

p value

χ2/df

CFI

TLI

RMSEA

LO 90

HI 90

PCLOSE

Model A

2636 (776)

p < .001

3.40

.80

.79

.067

.064

.069

< .001

         

Model B1

734 (272)

p < .001

2.70

.93

.92

.056

.051

.061

.02

         

Model B2

641 (269)

p < .001

2.38

.94

.93

.051

.046

.056

.42

668

p < .001

2.49

.93

.92

.052

.047

.057

.20

  1. χ2 Chi-square, df degrees of freedom, p p value, CFI comparative fit index, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, LO 90 lower limit of a 90% confidence interval for the population value of RMSEA, HI 90 upper limit of a 90% confidence interval for the population value of RMSEA, PCLOSE RMSEA p value
Back to article page