Psychology: Research and Review
From: Can a lexical decision task predict efficiency in the judgment of ambiguous sentences?
Ambiguous | Action related to subject | Action related to object | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measures | Mean (S.D.) | Mean (S.D.) | Mean (S.D.) | F(2) | p | η p 2 | Post hoc LSD |
Correct percentage | 79.3 (21.4) | 85.0 (16.11) | 80.91 (15.69) | 1.329 | .268 | .040 | – |
Average time | 4173.14 (1394.36) | 4119.69 (1039.79) | 4191.60 (1407.68) | 0.163 | .850 | .005 | – |
IES | 6216.44 (4597.33) | 5142.44 (2094.53) | 5459.93 (2367.42) | 1.359 | .255 | .041 | – |
Average number of fixations | 11.96 (5.08) | 11.65 (4.27) | 11.75 (4.79) | 0.392 | .644 | .012 | – |
Average time per fixation | 223.16 (69.21) | 222.49 (65.82) | 226.97 (70.39) | 1.239 | .297 | .037 | – |
Percentage of regressive saccades | 13.84 (3.35) | 14.84 (4.06) | 14.50 (3.94) | 3.449 | .038 | .097 | AMB × ARS |