Skip to main content

Psychology: Research and Review

Table 1 Characteristics of the included suicide prevention reviews

From: Scoping review of 30 years of suicide prevention in university students around the world: efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness

Revision (author and year)

AMSTAR score

Total studies included

Studies applied at universities

Years surveyed

Terms used by authors

Type of evaluation carried out

Harrod et al. (2014)

11

8

8

NLT to 2011

Effects

Efficacy

Yonemoto et al. (2019)

8

16

1

NLT to 2017

Effectiveness

Efficacy

Zechmeister et al. (2008)

8

14

1

NLT to 2007

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-effectiveness

Kreuze et al. (2017)

7

16

1

NR to 2015

Effectiveness

Efficacy

Kutcher et al. (2017)

7

6

1

NLT to 2017

Effectiveness

Efficacy

Robinson et al. (2018)

7

21

4

NR to 2016

Types of evidence

Efficacy

Witt et al. (2019)

6

39

1

NLT to 2017

Effectiveness

Efficacy

Wolitzky-Taylor et al. (2019)

5

15

15

2000–2018

Effects

Efficacy

  1. AMSTAR A tool to assess systematic literature reviews, NTL no time limit, NR not reported