Burnout syndrome in university professors and academic staff members: psychometric properties of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory–Brazilian version

Table 1 Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), convergent validity, and reliability of the CBI-Br to different samples

Sample	λ	x²/df	TLI	RMSEA	AVE	CR	Α
Sample	λ	x²/df	TLI	RMSEA	PB, WB, CB	PB, WB, CB	PB, WB, CB
Total	0.20–0.94	7.87	0.90	0.10	–	–	–
Total (refined)	0.71–0.94	6.09	0.94	0.09	0.73, 0.64, 0.74	0.94, 0.91, 0.95	0.94, 0.91, 0.95
SOHM	0.70–0.94	6.12	0.94	0.09	0.73, 0.64, 0.74	0.94, 0.91, 0.95	0.94, 0.91, 0.95
Test	0.70–0.95	3.91	0.93	0.09	0.73, 0.64, 0.75	0.94, 0.91, 0.95	0.94, 0.91, 0.95
Validation	0.71–0.94	3.27	0.94	0.08	0.74, 0.64, 0.74	0.94, 0.92, 0.94	0.95, 0.92, 0.94
Validation vs. test	0.70–0.95	3.59	0.94	0.06	–	–	–

λ factorial weights, x²/df chi-square by degrees of freedom, CFI comparative fit index, TLI Turkey-Lewis index, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, AVE average variance extracted, CR composite reliability, α Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, SOHM second-order hierarchical model, PB personal burnout, WB work-related burnout, CB colleagues-related burnout