Skip to main content

Psychology: Research and Review

Table 1 IEM unifactorial model in the 2014/2015 sample: completely standardized maximum likelihood estimates, average variance extracted, and composite reliability

From: Gender, planning, and academic expectations in first-year higher education students: testing two alternative mediation models

 

Model 1

 

Model 2

 

Item (factor)

β

R2

β

R2

1 (self-checking)

.58

.34

2 (planning)

.62

.39

.60

.36

3 (planning)

.61

.38

.64

.40

4 (planning)

.57

.32

5 (self-checking)

.57

.32

6 (self-checking)

.51

.26

7 (self-checking)

.51

.26

8 (planning)

.61

.37

.61

.37

9 (self-checking)

.63

.40

.67

.45

10 (self-checking)

.39

.15

11 (planning)

.59

.34

12 (planning)

.60

.36

.60

.36

13 (self-checking)

.69

.48

.69

.47

14 (self-checking)

.66

.43

.65

.42

15 (self-checking)

.57

.33

16 (planning)

.63

.40

.64

.41

17 (planning)

.56

.31

18 (self-checking)

.63

.40

.61

.38

19 (planning)

.57

.33

20 (planning)

.65

.43

.65

.42

AVE

.35

 

.41

 

CR

.91

 

.87

 
  1. Factor factor name in the IEM bi-factorial oblique model, β factor loading, R2 (communality) = 1 − ε (standardized residual), AVE average variance extracted, CR composite reliability