A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification: adaptation of a measure to the Brazilian context

Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica

Psychology: Research and Review

Table 2 Descriptive statistics and correlations for five components of in-group identification

Component	α	M	SD	ISS	IGH	SA	SO	CE
Region of the country
Individual self-stereotyping (ISS)	.88	4.81	1.56	–	.51 ^*	.44^*	.52^*	.48^*
In-group homogeneity (IGH)	.80	4.81	1.42		–	.35^*	.51^*	.35^*
Satisfaction (SA)	.91	5.91	1.18			–	.63 ^*	.45 ^*
Solidarity (SO)	.86	5.42	1.44				–	.64 ^*
Centrality (CE)	.79	4.67	1.63					–
University
Individual self-stereotyping (ISS)	.94	4.18	1.72	–	.43 ^*	.47^*	.69^*	.42^*
In-group homogeneity (IGH)	.85	4.41	1.55		–	.23^*	.41^*	.29^*
Satisfaction (SA)	.89	4.58	1.41			–	.62 ^*	.46 ^*
Solidarity (SO)	.85	4.80	1.54				–	.59 ^*
Centrality (CE)	.78	3.95	1.51					–

Note: Italic correlations are those of scales that refer to the same dimension. *p ≤ .01