Skip to main content

Psychology: Research and Review

Table 2 Descriptive statistics, group comparison results by SES, and Spearman’s correlations between measures

From: The development of episodic foresight in preschoolers: the role of socioeconomic status, parental future orientation, and family context

 

Descriptives

Comparison

Correlations

Tot

SES-MH

SES-L

U

ES

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1. EF.

4.27 (2.4)

5.65 (1.74)

2.7 (2.1)

147.5***

0.71

.31*

.37**

.59**

− .28**

.06

− .15

.30*

− .23

2. ToH

2.84 (1.69)

3.52 (1.4)

2.07 (1.7)

295.0**

0.42

.48**

.42**

− .30*

.05

− .27*

.17

− .25*

3. DR

4.06 (3.8)

5.6 (3.1)

2.37 (3.4)

243.5***

0.52

 

.42**

− .23

.09

− .26*

.28*

.03

4. PPVT

102.4 (17.8)

112.5 (12)

90.5 (16.3)

139.0***

0.72

  

− .30*

.10

− .19

− .03

− .34*

5. CFC-I

2.87 (1.27)

2.40 (1.0)

3.40 (1.43)

291.0**

− 0.43

   

− .11

.09

.08

.46**

6. CFC-F

4.56 (1.42)

4.68 (1.20)

4.4 (1.63)

472.5

0.07

    

− .24

.04

.29*

7. EG-L

1.90 (0.73)

1.77 (0.59)

2.05 (0.85)

400.5

− 0.22

     

.08

.05

8. EG-C

1.60 (0.66)

1.65 (0.67)

1.55 (0.66)

450.5

0.12

      

.24

9. EG-S

2.70 (1.01)

2.33 (0.58)

3.11 (1.22)

295.0**

− 0.42

       

  1. Standard deviation between parenthesis. SES-MH medium-high SES dyads, SES-L low SES dyads, 1 episodic foresight, 2 Tower of Hanoi, 3 delay reward, 4 Peabody Picture Verbal Test, 5 consideration of future consequences-immediate, 6 consideration of future consequences-future, 7 Etxadi-Gangoiti scale-limit setting; 8 Etxadi-Gangoiti scale-exposure to family conflict, 9 Etxadi-Gangoiti scale-parental stress, U Mann-Whitney U test, ES effect size (rank-biserial correlation)
  2. *p < .05
  3. **p < .01
  4. ***p < .001