Psychology: Research and Review
Table 2 Absolute goodness-of-fit indices for eight CFA models of the SWBQb in the Brazilian calibration sample (N = 436)
X2/df | GFI | CFI | RMSEA (90%IC) | AIC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1—one-factor model | 9.563 | .663 | .650 | .140 (.134–.147) | 1908.802 |
Model 2—hierarchical model | 4.13 | .858 | .877 | .085 (.078–.092) | 998.07 |
Model 3—original orthogonal model | 7.85 | .749 | .725 | .126 (.119–.132) | 1818.71 |
Model 4—original oblique model | 4.17 | .859 | .877 | .085 (.079–.092) | 1009.418 |
Model 5—modified oblique model (without items 6, 8 and 9) | 4.227 | .881 | .838 | .086 (.078–.094) | 760.723 |
Model 6—modified oblique model (without items 6, 8 and 9; correlation between error for items 1–2, 4–5 and 17–19). | 3.370 | .911 | .924 | .074 (.066–.082) | 678.769 |
Model 7—modified oblique model (without items 8, 9 and 15) | 4.249 | .881 | .897 | .086 (.079–.094) | 763.271 |
Model 8—modified oblique model (without items 8, 9 and 15; correlation between error for items 1–2, 4–5 and 17–19) | 3.398 | .908 | .926 | .074 (.066–.083) | 678.064 |