Relationship between coping and subjective well-being of elderly from the interior of the Brazilian Northeast

Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica

Psychology: Research and Review

Table 1 Indicators of adjustment of coping strategies measure, SLS and PANAS Scales

	Models	χ² (df)	GFI	AGFI	CFI	RMSEA (90 % CI)
Coping strategies	Four factors	1595.1	0.87	0.84	0.81	0.091 (0.089 – 0.094)
Coping strategies	Four factors	893	0.87	0.84	0.81	0.091 (0.089 – 0.094)
SLS	One factor	12.1	0.99	0.96	0.98	0.061 (0.016 – 0.106)
SLS	One factor	5	0.99	0.96	0.98	0.061 (0.016 – 0.106)
PANAS	Two factors	87.9	0.95	0.92	0.95	0.068 (0.051 – 0.085)
PANAS	Two factors	32	0.95	0.92	0.95	0.068 (0.051 – 0.085)

Obs: SLS satisfaction with life scale, PANAS positive and negative affect schedule
N = 381. χ² = chi-squared, df degrees of freedom, GFI goodness-of-fit index, AGFI adjusted goodness-of-fit index, CFI comparative fit index, RMSEA root-mean-square error of approximation, 90 % CI 90 % Confidence Interval